This is a piece written a year back and it is as good for this day as it was. Last year, TN Government brought about some changes in the common entrance exams for the professional colleges in the State and brought tension and havoc in the minds of the students and parents and the problem is yet to be settled. Whatever the “noble” ideas propounded by the government the modus operandi, as in many cases, smacks populism and it keeps everyone on tenter hooks.
Written last year this time:
“What should have been done…? ” – this could be always a possible interesting pastime for any easy chair-critic to keep one criticism after another on any move taken by others. But the present regime in Tamilnadu always gives ample chances even to serious critics since many of its decisions are either so sudden and unexpected or matters of serious contention. The present policy decision on CET for professional colleges came as a shock to many.
Leave alone the merits and demerits of the issue, it is so ill timed. Had this policy been taken for the coming academic year, the problems facing this policy now in courts of law would have been surmountable and fewer. Instead, now it has created a big legal tussle between the government and many aspiring students. Whether there is justification or not in CET score, whether there is any discrepancy in between urban and rural students in CET scores, the students as a whole should have been given the advantage of being what is in store for them in the coming days and on what they have to lay their hopes and all that. If they knew that there would not be any entrance exams they could have concentrated more on their final XII exams. Had they known that improvement marks are not to be considered at all, who would have toiled hard so much in vain and wasted a year for nothing. It is not a question whether the CET favors urban students; it is not a question whether those who sit for improvement exams get any undue advantage over the first timers; the question is why not the students – lakhs of them – and their parents were not given the chance to know what await them before hand?
There may be truth in the fear of the government that entrance exams make the chances of urban students better, though it is out rightly denied by many. Or the government might have given this argument as a vote-catching sentiment. But comes along with this statement one another fact: the XII exam pattern favors those with good rote learning and not those with analytical skills. Testing the analytical skills of the students is so far done through entrance exams. The government should have given some serious thinking on this and steps should have been taken to add at least 20% of such analytical and challenging questions in the regular final exams from next year. This should prepare the schools and teachers to make their approach and strategy different to suit this changed scenario. When tuition centers could prepare the students for such analytical questions within a month – the time between the final exams and the entrance exams – teachers and schools should be able to achieve it also.
Another factor to have been given good consideration is the fate of CBSE students. Right parameters should have been evolved to judge their performances at par with the XII stream students.
As is the custom with the present government, do we need some by-elections or something of that sort for rolling back this decision too ?
Post-script: Years roll by…different political parties head the governments… But what remains is the same: political decisions are taken in education without any educationists in the decision making. When would our politicians give due participation of the right people in their decision-making?